Scepticism is probably the most useful at the fringes of scientific knowledge. Not one study, you know, i think there ther people are so a, back to click bait d what gale was talking about. I mean, it's just a pathetic little study that got the attention of harvard magazine and their headline writers. But i'm not going to rush out and start having chocolate on my toast in the morning on the basis of 19 people in this study. It's magic over time to come up with results that can be trusted.
Michael Shermer speaks with Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer about the key psychological explanations for science denial and doubt that can help provide a means for improving scientific literacy and understanding — critically important at a time when denial has become deadly. Sinatra and Hofer offer tools for addressing science denial and explain both the importance of science education and its limitations, show how science communicators may inadvertently contribute to the problem, and explain how the internet and social media foster misinformation and disinformation. The authors focus on key psychological constructs such as reasoning biases, social identity, epistemic cognition, and emotions and attitudes that limit or facilitate public understanding of science, and describe solutions for individuals, educators, science communicators, and policy makers. If you have ever wondered why science denial exists, want to know how to understand your own biases and those of others, and would like to address the problem, this book will provide the insights you are seeking.