Debate Dilemmas: Moderation and Evasion

This chapter critiques a recent political debate moderated by David Muir, focusing on how the format allowed candidates, particularly Kamala Harris, to skirt direct questions on economic and abortion issues. It highlights the perceived bias of the moderators and their failure to hold candidates accountable for misinformation, especially regarding Trump's stance on abortion. The analysis underscores the complexities of the debate narrative, revealing frustrations with moderation that favored certain political perspectives while neglecting substantive inquiry.