Evolution of Go's Direction and Naming Conventions

This week we’re catching up on the news! Kris is joined by Ian to discuss some of the recent news from around the Go community. Listen in to hear whether the co-hosts believe there’s software that shouldn’t be written in Go, their thoughts on if Go is evolving in the right direction & whether common nouns make good package names.

Join the discussion

Changelog++ members save 6 minutes on this episode because they made the ads disappear. Join today!

Sponsors:

• Neo4j – Is your code getting dragged down by JOINs and long query times? The problem might be your database…Try simplifying the complex with graphs. Stop asking relational databases to do more than they were made for. Graphs work well for use cases with lots of data connections like supply chain, fraud detection, real-time analytics, and genAI. With Neo4j, you can code in your favorite programming language and against any driver. Plus, it’s easy to integrate into your tech stack.
• Speakeasy – Production-ready, Enterprise-resilient, best-in-class SDKs crafted in minutes. Speakeasy takes care of the entire SDK workflow to save you significant time, delivering SDKs to your customers in minutes with just a few clicks! Create your first SDK for free!

Featuring:

• Kris Brandow – GitHub, X
• Ian Lopshire – GitHub, X

Show Notes:

• What software shouldn’t you write in Go?
• The myth of Go garbage collection hindering “real-time” software?
• The long-overdue problem coming for some people in Go 1.23
• Don’t name packages common nouns
• Alternatives to Makefiles written in Go
• Go evolves in the wrong direction
• Teaching Concurrency
• Go: Don’t name packages common nouns
• Computation and State Machines

Something missing or broken? PRs welcome!