The Argument for Dating the Gospels After 70

I think there's agreement that the letters of Timothy and Titus, absolutely not Paul because he's a completely different person in them. There are some letters which are contentious and everyone thinks like a contentious. And there are the seven, I think authentic letters and from all together, every scholar thinks, yeah, these are authentic. Mm hmm. Now, I did have one question that probably should have gone earlier in the conversation. Do you find the destruction of the temple as a convincing argument for later gospels or is there a lot more to the arguments for dating the gospels after 70?