The Problem Isn't the Causal Libritarianism, It's the Event Casual Component

On the event causal view, for you to cause your action simply consists in desires, beliefs, reasons, emotions involving you causing that action. So i call this it ain't me argument. The worry is that on this event causal view there's a kind of reduction ism. Were reducing what the agent does to what states and events involving her de but she isn't identical with any of them. Do you think there is a promising way out of this problem while remaining a reductionist?