i always find these ones weird, where someone who echoes joe's main point, like, let's say, assuming he brought some one on to push one narrative. And then they say something that we know joe doesn't agree with, and he doesn't push back. I feel like joe could a push back a little bit there. What is soing directly against his what if pornography is like one of the main reasons were it is functiona? Listen, i'm not saying that i disagreed with her, but joe stance is pretty hard. The other way freedom, i think it's easier to argue that since we've had pornography, life has gotten a lot better and