The Importance of Fact and Value in Objectivism

The natural way to read it is this is the objectivist position. And that's part of why Dr. Picoff responded it and it fact and value starts off. He views this as a repudiation of objectivism's principles. That's what Kelly should have said - I fundamentally disagree with I'm Rand. It's unclear both in question of sanction. No, noquestion of sanction. This is an objectivism. But if you accept some ideas of I'm Rand's reject many. Yeah, I'm right wrong about this. I'm taking a different position but I can call it objectivism because I still agree with the fundamentals of objectivism sorry,. or he thinks no this is