
Neo-Calvinism, with Cory Brock and Gray Sutanto
Mere Fidelity
The Discourse on Common Grace
After Kuiperian bobbing, Schkilder argued that common grace should not be the motivator for Christian engagement with culture. He said it's actually cultural mandate that forces us to go and engage in culture. Another topic would be the doctrine of scripture. So if we say that scripture has the norm for all of the sciences, even though it's not the source, what does that mean exactly?
00:00
Transcript
Play full episode
Transcript
Episode notes
Speaker 1
When partnering with global governments, this can be done by, a, having the public pay for the vaccines through tax contributions. B, get global immunity against lawsuits and liability, thereby protecting profits. And c, have the governments assume the liability to be paid by the public funds, essentially having the people pay themselves. Key point, when we say the van group, we are really talking about the select flagship clients. These are the people making the most money from these actions. Again, a compartmentalized little group. Part one. Conclusion, we are witnessing the largest transfer of money from the people to a very selected group of super individuals, while abusing government authority to do it. So there is your incentive. It's and it's brilliant that he pointed that out. And i'm just going to highlight a couple of points for all the people to like. Why would they lie? I would all the people. You would need every doctor in the world and every nurse in the world and every government official in the world and every journalist in the world. You'd have to have them all involved in a big, complex conspiracy. It's impossible. No, you don't. That's not what anybody with a brain has ever said. That's not how it works. It's a compartmentalized structure. It's key people in key positions making policy decisions that are passed down to the people that don't question them. Even you are being employed in this conspiracy to promote a fake pandemic. Not saying there wasn't anything going around, just that it wasn't a pandemic. It was just a harsh thing. And i can understand. In the beginning, you react, oh, what's really going on? But once the data starts coming out, you adjust your policy. Science, as they said, is fluid, isn't it? Can keep as we update the science, we learn more. But why didn't they update the science when they learned more? Because it was never about health. The policies put in place were not there to protect your health. They were there to continue to allow the profits to increase for a vanguard group, these pharmaceutical giants, even the media. These people have a financial incentive to keep this going. The government has a power incentive and also a financial incentive to keep their control going over to completely rewrite the script, destroy your constitutions, ignore the nuremberg codes. There's there's an incentive involved here. And then there's also the fact that a lot of your government officials are not really that bright. And so they just follow what they're told, just like you followed what you were told de normes, just like most people followed what they were told. The people up the hierarchy also do the same, cause it's a compartmentalized, military like structure. Who writes the script that your joe bydens are reading? Who writes the script that justin trudo is reading? Who writes the script that your local doctor is just repeating to you? Who trains these people? Who funds the organizations that train these people? Who benefits from all this basic questions. So the reason the masks, even though they'ren making trillions, never make that argument. Oh, they they. They made them mask mandates cause they were gtting rich off it. No, no, no, that's not it. The masks were a means to a different end. Number one, if you want mass compliance in the population to take your experimental drug, of which your going to have an estimate of around 500 trillion dollars of profit from and that's only round one, and it's going to keep going endlessly. It's literally the most profitable business in the world. Bill gates admitted that on life television, by the way, you don't go in on the vaccine in the beginning. That would be stupid. People go, no, it's they would catch on. What you do is you go to mass. So you do all these guide lines, and you keep, if that keeps the public awareness cause, if without the masking, without the tape on the floors, without the signs everywhere, without the constant barrage and the advertisements on the sides of busses, weren't a pandemic? Weren't a pandemic, pandemic, pandemic. Over ninteencoa, nineten coninty. Without that and without the masking, would you've even noticed? We were in the biggest pandemic to ever strike the planet, according to these people. I still go down town victoria and i see the exact same homeless people running around with shoping carts, mumbling to themselves now as i did in 20 20. So they survived. How did that? Do they vaccinate? Do they wash their hands? Do they wear masks? Some of them do.
Neo-Calvinism is in the air. But is it theologically relevant or merely a political phenomenon? Or did the Americans just mess it up? Cory Brock and Gray Sutanto join Matt, Derek, and Alastair to make the case for Neo-Calvinism and discuss their new book on the subject. Full show notes at www.merefidelity.com. Timestamps: Family Friendly [0:00] More than Politics [2:10] Misunderstood Doctrine [9:15] Lost in Translation [13:47] Apartheid [20:12] Too Programmatic? [24:01] Necessary Context? [30:11] Common Grace [34:44] Doctrinal Development [41:43]