AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
3min chapter
*Patreon Preview* Decoding Academia #2: False Positive Psychology
Decoding the Gurus
Is There a Better Way to Decide Which Academic to Hire?
i don't think there's an easy solution to this one presently. Or publications and citations to those publications is the ultimate bench mark the which academics are judged. Am unfortunately, stuff that gets published tends to be shiny, new, exciting,. And therefore creates this massive incentive in it these unhelpful incidents. But i think amongst certain kinds of researchers, and they're increasingly common, the negative repplication is valued. It might not be valued in the citation metrics, but i think there’s an increasing awareness and there's increasing moves from funding bodies to require things like openso science protocols be applied for san stuff. Being transparent. That a priori verses post decision
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode