Then I'm a Cynic Masquerading as a Skeptic.

I think that the experiment ther using are contrived, and i don't think t they actually relate to previotic earth at all. I think that they are basically jerry rigging naturalism and proving that intelligence is actually needed. That might be the last one, unless somebody has here i go. A question for smoky. You say you want to evaluate claims, yet you don't seem to understand that positive claims bear the bargain. How do your claims? I give us a burden, a burden of proof to who, for who? And you know, you might be a cynic masquerading as a sceptic, and you're not able to realistically be convinced of the existence