Legal Battle Over Administrative Stay in Immigration Case

The chapter explores the intricate legal process of a case involving a state's attempt to preempt federal immigration law, focusing on conflicting court decisions and the predictability of Supreme Court rulings. It delves into the Fifth Circuit's use of administrative stays, the slow pace of proceedings, and Justice Barrett's critique of this practice. Justices Kagan and Sotomayor offer dissenting views on the case, highlighting criticisms of SB 4 and the Fifth Circuit's behavior.