A newyork times article says that masks do work, but mandates don't. If you can touch the screen right after you poured the water still wet, it did something. But if you could argue that it worked, or that you should put screens on your roof instead of shingles, that's a sort of a bad argument. So i think when they need studies to say masks work, it did create some friction, but not enough to make a difference. And then the article hypothesises that's because people were bad at wearing their masks. Here's what i think, nobody social socially distance at home. Maybe that whole thing. What do you say? Some some say no
My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
- 58% of Democrats want Fed control of "hate speech"
- Janet Yellen wrong on "transitory inflation"
- No natural immunity for Omnicron?
- Sussman trial, what was the defense?
- Hillary vs Putin, the long game
- Everything you suspected was true
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support