Bashing Mollvie - The Great Gatsby

Mollvie, for instance, her reading of Citizen Kane, I think, is just unequaled. She didn't ask for that essay to be taught universally, right? And what Joan does, this, I mean, by not mentioning, like, by not mentioned that essay and not getting into it, I think what she is saying is that the mistake was Foucault's. This is a great Gatsby of psychoanalytic literature. What she's getting at and what she wants to say is that the power knowledge dyad is a tautology. She says non sequitur. The then clauses are too obviously not necessary consequences of the if clause for if