i id just like to close and give the example of a country like israel and to some extent, england. They don't have constitutions. Somehow, without a constitution, they, i don't know what rules, implicit rules they use,. But they don't have any explicit rules that they are pretending to conform to a constitutional order. What do you think about countries that don't have one? And to what extent does england not have one? Countries that don’t have constitutions, tend to have an expanded interpretive tradition. It's basically torra and midrash so that the midrashim are a bunch of writings, of rabbinical writings overtime
More than we need rules, argues Michael Munger, we need rules about the rules. So does the United States need a new Constitution? Listen as the Duke University economist and political scientist talks to host Russ Roberts about public choice, consenting to coercion, and whether constitutions matter.