Fowler's Jiezek

I think that conflicts a little bit with, I think the best chapter of Fowler's book about Jiezek and how we use this. And what Fowler wants to nail down is that Jiezek is never giving you an example that completely explains the concept. He never does this. The example should always like either deepen the concept or it should only, it shouldn't fit 100% and it should force some sort of retroactive understanding so that you can never see it in the naive way again. This is something that I try to teach to just in my classes because I think it's such an important idea.