Like relativity, relatively, requires tensor mathematics. It's sort of like a complicated vector mathematics. You can't explain relativity using statistics. It's just the wrong math. So it seems to me you're employing just a different model, or an analogue or metaphor. I had matthew cub on the show here last year with his book on the idea of the brain. And so it's like a history of metaphors used to explain the brain. Okno, we can't get inside thereu. We have to employ some kind of analogue model metaphor to try to explain it. But maybe you're right. Nutwa a, is non it not a metaphor. Not a metaphor. Or
Why do you exist? How did atoms and molecules transform into sentient creatures that experience longing, regret, compassion, and even marvel at their own existence? What does it truly mean to have a mind―to think? Science has offered few answers to these existential questions until now.
Michael Shermer speaks with computational neuroscientist, Ogi Ogas, about his unified account of the mind that explains how consciousness, language, self-awareness, and civilization arose incrementally out of chaos, and how leading cities and nation-states are developing “superminds,” and perhaps planting the seeds for even higher forms of consciousness.