I think because of this false diconomy we have between scholarly books and popular, so called dumb down books, this is a bad way to look at it. It's kind of treating readers with disrespect, like you're so stupid you're not going to understand, you know, the technical aversion of my theory. No, how about the burden is on you, the writer to make it clear and interesting, because there're so many books to choose. I want everything that i've done, yo, also think in the type specimen of the genra a in richard dawkins, the selfish jean,. This is not the popular version of his technical papers, it's the
Michael Shermer speaks with Chris Edwards about educational reform, his study and teaching of world history, the problems in K–12 education, the zip-code model vs. the seat time model of education and how they result in massively different educational outcomes, how “no child left behind” left children behind, federal vs. state educational systems, cheating scandals and what to do about them, the future of education in a world of free (or nearly free) online learning, comparing the U.S. educational system to other countries. Shermer and Edwards also discuss thought experiments, based on Edwards’ latest book, Thought Experiments: History and Applications for Education.