I think because of this false diconomy we have between scholarly books and popular, so called dumb down books, this is a bad way to look at it. It's kind of treating readers with disrespect, like you're so stupid you're not going to understand, you know, the technical aversion of my theory. No, how about the burden is on you, the writer to make it clear and interesting, because there're so many books to choose. I want everything that i've done, yo, also think in the type specimen of the genra a in richard dawkins, the selfish jean,. This is not the popular version of his technical papers, it's the

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode