AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
The Security Insecurity Paradox
There's this academic concept that originated out of the cold war known as the security insecurity paradox. The idea being that weapons of mass destruction may actually deter large-scale combat but it might and quite perversely actually incentivize more conflict at lower thresholds of violence. As we return to an era of strategic competition with the looming specter of great power war now hanging over eastern europe and possibly the western pacific how can the u.s. employed lessons learned from oir for a future conflict? How do we find consistency in a world where you know there's certainly some heavy weights that can really hurt each other?