The Impossible Real and Scarequos

Rian lacon remains faithful to this platonic notion of lack. And for lacon straightway, it's always lack of object, rightats mental bout the object. For freud and for lecon as you say, with iththe matonomy, it'salways a question of substitutes. Refinding the lost ject is never, it'sAlways a part of fantasy. But i thinkthat for dlos and quatri this is why, for example, they turn to purverts. Why we purverts want to be edipolized, right? They have the fetish itself provides this lubricated, easy access. It was locon who was obsessed with how he was