Finale had the idea for his site after seeing how claims of scientific consensus were used to stifle debate during the pandemic. He says he did not like the way in which questions on the origins of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 were dismissed by many high-profile voices as unscientific and off-limits. With no dedicated funding, Finale launched a basic version of the website in April to show how it could work. In pilot studies, he has invited virologists to comment on whether the database GIS-AID is the best venue for sharing information on pathogens in a public health emergency. And asked researchers in artificial intelligence about the merits of a
Shocked by the impact of online misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, several researchers are launching efforts to survey scientists’ thinking on issues from vaccine safety to climate change. They hope that their projects will make scientific debate, and degrees of consensus, more visible and transparent, benefiting public conversation and policymaking. However, others suggest that these attempts might merely further politicize public debate.
This is an audio version of our Feature: Can giant surveys of scientists fight misinformation on COVID, climate change and more?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.