Is There a Falliblist in You?

I cannot confirm that all three of those propositions are even true. But more important is this, how did you come to choose those particular propositions as candidates for immunity from criticism? Why delphian, not athens? Why two plus two and not three plus four? Why not the theorem of pythagoras? I see, had i held them immune from criticism, i would have had no way of arriving at that conclusion. So you are, after all, a thorough going falliblist, though you mistakenly believed you were not. That is so moreover, had i not criticised it, i could not have come to understand why it is true. My doubt improved my knowledge of an