The Great Principle of Undulation in Nature

Emerson just seems much less misanthropic than schopenhauer to me, and much less concerned with dionysian joy than nita. Yea, that really is just talking about a pattern of this happens ind the this aits circles. It's again, saying, things acting according to their tilos. I didn't completely understand what he meant in that last little bit there. But here action is now, in part, straight up labor, as opposed to this more abstract kind of action. We were discussing, well, it's hard to not read this whole section, and really allf emerson that we read from a labor slash new work slash marxist