This chapter explores the complexities of electoral processes in a politically divided Congress, with a focus on the validation of election results amidst biases. It discusses the historical implications of state versus federal oversight in electoral disputes and the challenges posed by the Electoral Count Act. The chapter raises concerns about voter suppression and the potential for manipulation of electors, while questioning the effectiveness of Congressional oversight in ensuring equitable elections.
In this episode, we speak with Professor Stephen Siegel, a Professor of Law at DePaul University, about the Electoral Count Act, which sets the rules for Congress when it counts electoral votes. We explain what happens if there is just one slate and how Congress might resolve a controversy if there are competing slates of electors from one state.