i feel like a busybody talking about this, but i have to talk about it anyway. A george mason university psyce professor sued the university because he felt that a title nine ruling against him was unfair. He claimed that he was biased and there was bias against him for being a man. In teaching a class about sexuality as an example of exhibitionism, he gave a personal anecdote of getting sucked off in a fart. Apparently some students didn't like that. I feel like he was braggingw for sure, he washis man. But yes, he is also in a snarky, contemptuous mood in the piece that we read, twilight of the idol. We'll
Socrates was ugly and tired of life, so he made a tyrant of reason. Philosophers are mummies who hate the body and the senses. Reason is a tricky old woman. Morality is a misunderstanding. Kant is a sneaky Christian. And don't even get Nietzsche started on "free will" or the "self" - just excuse for priests to punish people, a hangman's metaphysics. David and Tamler dive into Friedrich Nietzsche's Twilight of the Idols, a fascinating set of aphorisms brimming with passion, provocation, questions without answers.
Plus, a professor is sanctioned for sex talk with his students - fair or coddling foul?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: