Do Republicans Talk Tough About Bloody Revolutions With Guns?

i'm asserting that it is normal for republicans to talk tough about bloody revolutions with guns, but don't really mean it. Bcause it's always if this went too far, but it never goes that far. What do you think? Is it typical talk? And do you not take it as being too serious? Ys, bravado. It's it's the reason they have guns. If your whole reason for existing is to defend the republic, then when you talk about your reason for existing, you would say things such as, if things go too far, we're going to use our guns to do something bloody. So somebody says, i'm on point to day. Is