You would want an argument such as this to somehow have mounted, like a case from the medical literature saying that biological age is a construct. That doctors think could even be derived like that. It reminds me of long ball larry like it maybe your ball is to long, long, too long. As as you say, he seems to never even ponder the possibility that just outlying age discrimination is what you should do. Why notwhy not measure the reflexes and hire them on the basis of that? You don't need to do another fucking p one, p two, like conclusion there.
Many of us think that art is subjective, but at the same time it seems like some artistic judgments are better than others. Do you think Crash deserved to receive an award for Best Picture? Did you like Season 2 of Ted Lasso? Well you’re wrong. So how do we reconcile these two conflicting attitudes about art? David and Tamler turn to David Hume’s classic essay Of the Standard of Taste (link in notes) for help. Will Pizarro finally see the error of his ways on Straw Dogs?
Plus a doozy of a medical ethics paper – should we allow people to change their legal age if it doesn’t match their "biological" and "emotional" age?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: