Kant's Argument for Systematicity

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

"I don't think he's saying anything she doesn't have to stand on objective ground like when you say he thinks what he's saying is true," says host. "He just says absolutely all the better it's not internal incoherence as you said you weren't going to uh accusing him of but i do think it's substantive even if it's not claiming to have transcended the problems that these other philosophies have and now is in some sort of objective standpoint that can regard them as misguided in all these kind of foolish ways", adds Podolski. This episode of very bad wizards is brought to you once again by Nord VPN one of my favorite internet services a virtual private network

David and Tamler dive into the first two parts of Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil which contain some of Nietzsche’s best drive-bys on philosophers like Plato, Descartes, the Stoics, Kant, and Hegel along with beliefs in free will, hard determinism, Christianity, morality, conceptual analysis, objectivity, and the value of truth. We argue about Nietzsche’s metaphilosophy and the implications of thinking that all philosophy amounts to a personal confession by the author. Plus – have David’s prayers been answered? Does quantum theory entail that our consciousness outlives the death of our physical bodies? A blog post about a somewhat recent book says yes!