Is There a Consensus of Freedom?

i'd like you to diexploin ohe i've totally explained it. There are no problems at walmer. There are only areas of rsa. I think freedom is thus inherently retroactive. At its most elementary, is not simply a free act which out of nowhere starts a new causal link but a retroactive act of determining which link, sequence of necessities will determine us. It's the only way it can be conceived as freedom, is through likeh like the drama of of likht,. Like a genuine free act has to cause some sort of subjective sacrifice - especially because it's excessive.