The Learning Curve for Seep as Plus Syntax

I think my personal number one criterion would be that you could show contracts with whatever syntax we should choose to somebody who has some seep as plus experience but hasn't been exposed to standard contracts before. I'm a little wary of the ones that just look like a function call because it's not like that expression is not necessarily evaluated at all which in other than a size of operator application generally isn’t the case when you see something with that syntax. The attribute like the attributes syntax calls that out as like here's an expression it's going to be treated a little bit differently than it would be somewhere else, he says.