The only reason to give feedback is if it can help them with their project, right? So it's like, if you just give it in a way where they're not emotionally able to receive it, then you've kind of defeated the purpose. I try to give the vibe, we were on a team together trying to figure out how to do this thing really well and like, hmm, have you thought about this? Well, what about that? Could this be a problem and so on?"
Read the full transcript here.
Is it possible to be both agreeable and skeptical in conversations? How can you give feedback and challenge people constructively without triggering their automatic self-defense mechanisms? More generally, how can you challenge people intellectually without riling them up emotionally? What skills are needed to be able to have detailed, productive conversations across a wide range of topics? How can you push through plateaus in the process of self-improvement? What are podcasts as a medium good for?
Find more about Spencer through his website, spencergreenberg.com.
Staff
Music
Affiliates