i think he uses the example of evolutionary theory, teach it in such a way that they're going to misinterpret it, and then show them how they misinterpreted. That's sort of what you're talking about. You give them the experience of failure. And that's a good way of learning what the right interpretation is. In the star track universe, the're, somebody tweated about thisd it's a great example. There is a when they're training cadets, they put em through a simulation. It's called the kobayashi maro. The whole point of the test is to show the cadets that there will be no win situations. This seems as if we
The less we know, the more we know it. David and Tamler talk about the notorious Dunning-Kruger effect, which makes us overconfident in beliefs on topics we're ignorant about and under-confident when we're experts. Plus, we break down an evolutionary psychology article on why poor men and hungry men prefer women with big breasts. Trust us, it's a really bad study. We're sure about it.
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: