Is the Uni to Quo Quos?

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

i think a violence in any context should be rejected and condemned. But i do think it's categorically different when there is a concerted attack on the institutions of government. That to meis something fundamentally much more disorderly, a much more threatening to the pillars of our society. It reflects a sentiment that is completely at odds with the responsibilities of our democratic citizenry to respect the outcomes of elections.

Online trolls and fascist chat groups. Controversies over campus lectures. Cancel culture versus censorship. The daily hazards and debates surrounding free speech dominate headlines and fuel social media storms. In an era where one tweet can launch — or end — your career, and where free speech is often invoked as a principle but rarely understood, learning to maneuver the fast-changing, treacherous landscape of public discourse has never been more urgent. In Dare to Speak: Defending Free Speech for All, Suzanne Nossel, a leading voice in support of free expression, delivers a vital, necessary guide to maintaining democratic debate that is open, free-wheeling but at the same time respectful of the rich diversity of backgrounds and opinions in a changing country.

Shermer and Nossel discuss: private vs. government restrictions on speech; hate speech, libel, slander, compelled speech; incitement to violence and insurrection; cancel culture; social media censorship; the euphemism treadmill, and more…