i don't see a principled reason to accept the existence of chairs, but not the existence of free will. Could i have more respect for an attitude that says, neither one of them exists? I get that no chairs and tables are onds, and see the reference. And we can stipulate that there are clear examples of them and what those examples consist in. But if you and ia sought to identify a clear case of free will, right, we wouldn't be able to do that. We would identify an action that somebody undertook, and you would say that action was an example of acting freely. And i would say it is not.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode