Is This Really a Good Book? Is It a Good Book or a Companion Piece?

The book comes out in nineteen ninety nine and really um... for uh... psychoanalytic theory for ideology critique for studies of of the hagel this was seismic. Slavoli actually uses that term in his introduction here to say what he wants to do is to distinguish lacon from that tradition right so i thought it was like all part of what at the time i called post structuralism  i now know better than to call post structuralism Right? So then a friend paul isinson who's delisian loved anti-edipas talked about it in class all the time he ends me sublime object of ideology but I didn't even look at the table of contents