AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Summary
Transcript
Episode notes
The case is about whether you can compel someone to speak against their beliefs. The court didn't decide which side wins really, but it said that a human rights commission in the early stages of the case made comments hostile to religion. It's not clear that the logic of the web designer's argument has a natural stopping point. But how is refusing service just because of someone's race or gender or sexual orientation, in this case, not just clear discrimination against a protected class?
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode