Relevance of Civil Case Against Trump to Jack Smith Trials

The hosts analyze the relevance of a civil case against Trump to the Jack Smith trials, discussing the concept of 'once a fraudster, always a fraudster' and the use of evidence of fraud in a civil case.

Transcript

chevron_right

Play full episode

chevron_right

Transcript

Episode notes

This week in Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon stays the trial calendar pending Trump’s motion for a delay due to CIPA section 4, and new reporting that Trump shared nuclear submarine capabilities with an Australian businessman.

In DC, Donald files a motion to dismiss all charges based on absolute presidential immunity; an opposition to DOJ CIPA motions; Jack Smith files a motion in support of his original motion for a pre-trial don’t-call-it-a-gag order based on Trump’s posts about Mark Milley and an unrelated possible firearm purchase.

SCOTUS declines to hear Eastman’s attempt to block access to his emails; plus a listener question.

A couple of terms to remember:

Brady Rule | US Law |Cornell Law School | Legal Information Institute

Jencks Material | Thomson Reuters Practical Law Glossary

Brian Greer on CIPA

The Quick Guide to CIPA (Classified Information Procedures Act)

Questions for the pod -

Submit questions for the pod here

Check out other MSW Media podcasts

https://mswmedia.com/shows/

Follow AG:

Follow Mueller, She Wrote on Post