Neuroscientist Andrew Huberman has become one of the most popular science podcasters in the world. His regular two- to four-hour episodes feature a dizzying assault of information on topics like physical and mental fitness, psychedelics, hair loss, brain optimization, and a host of other topics, sometimes with expert guests, while at other times he goes solo. And many of these episodes are super informative and inspirational.
And yet, at times it seems like Huberman is sacrificing quality for quantity. This week, we look at three instances in which Andrew Huberman appears to be speaking outside of his lane, or perhaps overhyping supplements for his own benefit, and we want to know what else is being sacrificed along the way. McGill Office for Science and Society science communicator, Jonathan Jarry, joins the discussion.
Show Notes
Andrew Huberman Has Supplements on the Brain
How Podcaster Andrew Huberman Got America to Care About Science
The Real-Life Diet of Andrew Huberman, Who Switches to Red Party Lights After Dark
The Huberman Effect
NEUROSCIENTIST: This Habit Makes You UGLY | Andrew Huberman
Paul Ingraham critique of Huberman
“Evidence-Based Medicine” vs Science-Based Medicine
Dave Asprey’s Use of PED’s
New York Times review of Tim Ferris’s book 4-Hour Body
Michelle Wong’s query about sunscreen crossing blood-brain barrier
Neuroscientist Asaf Weisman’s opinion on Huberman
Sports Scientist Matt Stranberg opinion on Huberman
“Health Nerd” Gideon Meyer-Katz on misrepresented “cold-plunge” paper
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
