The Thetism of the Revolution

Despite his criticism, this kind of theticism of the almost religious, apocalyptic quality of revolution is still very prevalent in some major thinkers. I think that rolepont is a lot more realistic and grounded, where he says, no, religions are religions. Revolutions don't just emerge spontaneously as these kind of events in the of being. It takes a huge amount of work, much of which is going to be incredibly mordaned. And you can't even count on just inspiring people by ideas to change things, because you actually need to show them.