I'm Not for Slavery, but I Am Not for It.

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Slavery was terrible, but we do have to recognize that it was a different time. Fairness is very fairness is important. And fairness hasn't been given to to th black people who have been affected by slavery. But if getting reparations will mean that white people will feel t at theyave been betrayed, and then we'll havei uncivil unrest. Ga, civil war andunrest. Thank you.

Should there be a broad programme of reparations – not just financial compensation, but acknowledgement of the crimes committed and the lasting damage caused by slavery? Or would this just worsen social tensions by reopening old wounds? That's the theme of this week's Sunday Debate. Arguing for the motion were Kehinde Andrews, Professor of Black Studies at Birmingham City University; and Esther Stanford-Xosei, reparations activist and lawyer. Arguing against the motion were Katharine Birbalsingh, headmistress and co-founder of Michaela Community School in London; and Tony Sewell, educational consultant and CEO of the charity Generating Genius. The debate was chaired by social historian and presenter Emma Dabiri.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/intelligencesquared.

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices