I Believe in Putting Trump in Jail

i dont gt admit tei now imagine that the same a g has teemed up with local prosecutors on a two pronged investigation, one civil and one criminal. That a g already has declared publicly, before she took office, that you had engaged in a pattern and practice of money wandering. Since then, she has upped the antie by claiming to a judge that her office had uncovered significant evidence that you had committed fraud. Against that backdrop, you get a sapina. Now the a g going to question you under oath in the civil investigation about the very same topics at the centr of the still pending criminal investigation. What would a reasonable person do here? What would you