If a climate scientist says, here's my projection of what's going to happen into the future, I say that's not credible. And then my critics say you're being anti-science, because all the scientists are on the same page and they know more than Scott does. So if I see a scientist show me a data analysis or projection, specifically a projection, he's in his domain. He's not in his own domain. If I call bullshit on my domain, then you should agree with me if you like experts, right?