Is Ivomecton Really a Gold Standard Randomized, Controlled Trial?

New York Times was the source of what i tweeted. On one hand, you've got the new york times saying that there's a gold standard randomized, controled trial that says iv mactan does not work period. And so you have that evidence on the other side. I judge those to be equally credible. There's no difference in the credibility of those two things. They both have zero credibility, don't they? Which one has any credibility? He'd say neithe. Wouldn't you? Would you give any credibility to a newyork times report about a random ise control trial? Sorry, it's 20 22 and that dog is dead. That dog is dead