Every year, the Environmental Working Group, a Washington, DC-based lobbying group, publishes its “Dirty Dozen” report, which supposedly informs consumers about the 12 “dirtiest” fruits and vegetables. The report is repeated verbatim by major media outlets, which routinely demonize strawberries, blueberries, and other conventionally-grown produce. But does their science hold up?
Not according to the majority of scientists and researchers. Over the decades, the EWG has slammed some pesticides but not others, ignored data on dosages, and even wondered out loud if all that mercury in vaccines might just be causing autism. They also routinely ignore potentially hazardous organic chemicals, while selling “verified” labels for skin care products and sunscreens.
Today Derek is going to walk me, the non-science journalist, through the work of the EWG before he talks to biomedical scientist Dr Andrea Love and cosmetic chemist Dr Michelle Wong about the group’s questionable methodologies and fear-mongering tactics.
Show Notes
Environmental Working Group and the Dirty Dozen
The Environmental Working Group’s “Dirty Dozen” list is a danger to public health put out by an organic industry funded activist group
Influence Watch: Environmental Working Group
Dietary Exposure to Pesticide Residues from Commodities Alleged to Contain the Highest Contamination Levels
Ken Cook: The Story of The Environmental Working Group
What Biden’s oil record means for the industry’s future
Alleged ‘deal’ offer from Trump to big oil could save industry $110bn, study finds
10 years after Flint's lead water crisis began, a lack of urgency stalls 'proper justice'
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
