You have to cultivate, am a lot of theoretic propositional procedure and also prespectival plausibility. So then, you know, e there's different practices, again, for doing that. I could see how people vary around that. Then i do think that what you need to do is at the distributed cognition level? I do think you need a meta psychotechnology. It has to be analogous to platonic, neo platonic dialectic. And so you get people so that they can identify with the functionality of the opponent. Processing within distributed cognition as opposed to adversarial debating.
John Vervaeke answers questions live. This is the first in a series of live Q&As with Future Thinkers podcast guests.
Participation in the discussion is exclusive to Future Thinkers Premium Members. If you want to become a Member, go to http://members.futurethinkers.org/ and get access to our in-depth courses in personal evolution, private group calls, podcast extras, Q&A's with prominent thinkers, and more.
Check out our Watch Parties and Discussions of John Vervaeke's Awakening from the Meaning Crisis lecture series on YouTube.
Future Thinkers previous interview with John Vervaeke: http://www.futurethinkers.org/98
Enter our contest at http://www.futurethinkers.org/giveaway and win 6 months worth of Premium Membership, as well as 1 month supply of Qualia Nootropic Energy from Neurohacker Collective.