The Importance of Cost in Liberal Strategies for Fluid Resuscitation

The actual bolus doses or volume that's given for fluid resuscitation sort of almost melts down into the background. So is there still a case for a conservative fluid management? But because the hypothesis that it would be better, obviously the abstract conclusion had to say among the adult ICU population with septic shock intravenous fluid restriction does not result in fewer deaths at a 90 than the standard intravenous therapy group. Or why adopt liberal strategies? I just want to just focus on the cost. Remember, these are costs per 100 mils. And again, they're obviously much more expensive.