A Ha Ha Ha, Because It Runs Alone.

Tod says that it implies both a political decision to assert a claim about the world and a psychic investment in the claim about identity. Yet he says that identity is incapable of being identity, or identical with itself, without introducing some form of other ness that reveals the lack of perfect self identity. So if you think a equals a, the et presence of the equal sign the lies that a is identical with itself,. because all, yesa is just the letter a. Yes, that was just a very basic philosophical annoyance with objectivism. Obviously not worthy of the name of a philosophical system. It's a very high falutin name for itself.