Gaute eineva: I find your poetic naturalist outlook to be both sensible and appealing. Everything we see is, at a fundamental level, described by the corp theory of particle physics. But this does not prevent us from talking about phenomena in the microscopic world using other terms, such as temperature or chair. From what i understand you also believe that the hard problem of consciousness eventually can be explained by weak emergence, starting with the laws of physics. Do you have any insight to add to me feel less daunted?