The Paradox of Love

Logical positism was trying to say that no statements are true unless they can be shown empirically to be true. But the problem here, via self reflection, is that that statement itself is not an empirical verified statement. So in order to be a logical positivist, you have to deny self reflection. And that's exactly what logicalPositivism did. You can use logicalpositivism on every else, but you can't turn it in on itself, otherwise it collapses. This is true of every single conceptual peradigmatic scheme that you can imagine. We'll fall prey to this sort of self reflection problem if you reflect deeply enough. Most people aren't willing to do because