If it's true that the way in which tet, say, tree hogers are allocating concern vis human lovers is because they perceive some sort of mental tradeo between these two categories, i think that could be quite a valuable thing. As you point out as well, it's quite likely that the resources that we need to do certain positive things are available to us if we have reorient our perspective on the world. You know, those famous studies of so called moral saints like lerisait mcfarquehar and ati spellet pronounce it. Her book, the strangeris drowning.
Transcript
chevron_right
Play full episode
chevron_right
Transcript
Episode notes
I was raised in the tradition of believing that everyone is of equal moral worth. But when I scrutinise my daily practices, I don’t think I can honestly say that I act as if everyone is of equal moral worth. The idea that some people belong within the circle of moral concern and some do not is central to many moral systems. But what affects the dynamics of the moral circle? How does it contract and expand? Can it expand indefinitely? In this episode I discuss these questions with Joshua Rottman. Josh is an associate Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Program in Scientific and Philosophical Studies of Mind at Franklin and Marshall College. His research is situated at the intersection of cognitive development and moral psychology, and he primarily focuses on studying the factors that lead certain entities and objects to be attributed with (or stripped of) moral concern.
