In the voyage of the beagle, which is the work that the razan talks about, its sik almost like a journal of his observations as he goes to the glabagos and just describes what he sees. And it's not even clear that there's aio space for that within the field of psychology. So, you know, darwin's descriptive work led to this insight. None of the evidente that darwin could have presented, or even that many people can present now, for evolution by natural selection, none of it alone meets evidentiary standards for proof. It's the weight of all of these observations with the absence of a plausible alternative account, that
Is social psychology just a kid dressing up in grown-up science clothes? Are the methods in social psychology--hypothesis-driven experiments and model-building--appropriate for the state of the field? Or do these methods lead to a narrowing of vision, stifled creativity, and a lack of informed curiosity about the social world> David and Tamler discuss the strong methodological critique of psychology from two of its leading practitioners - Paul Rozin and Solomon Asch.
Plus, food porn, real estate porn, outrage porn, and David's personal favorite - power washing porn.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: